Thoughts: Should HIV-positive Prisoners Be Segregated?

Wednesday, September 19, 2012

When it comes to prisons and the treatment of prisoners, provisions are constantly in battle over polices and regulations. The latest issue being debated on is the treatment of HIV-positive prisoners.

In Alabama, prisoners are made to wear white wrist bands to distinguish themselves from other inmates. While in South Carolina, prisoners are housed in maximum-security facilities alongside those on death row.

The American Civil Liberties Union will be in court Monday to challenge Alabama’s long standing policy of segregating HIV positive prisoners from the remainder of the prison population, the Associated Press reports.

U.S. District Judge Myron Thompson will hear arguments in a trial at the federal courthouse in Montgomery on whether he should order Alabama prison officials to end the policy. The issue has been tried twice before with each trial ending with rulings against the inmates. The state has asked Thompson to throw the case out and rule that the issues have been covered in the previous trials. Thompson has said he would defer a ruling on that motion until after he has heard the testimony in this trial.

The lead attorney in the case for the ACLU, Margaret Winter, said HIV is now controlled by medicine and is no longer the death sentence it was once considered to be. She called continuing to isolate HIV inmates “absurd” and said Alabama and South Carolina are the only states that continue the practice.

Although prisoners waive certain rights for committing crimes, the lawsuit mentions that each inmate upon entering the prison system in tested for HIV.

“The HIV test will determine where the prisoner will be housed, eat, and recreate,” the suit says.

The trial is expected to last about a month.

Proponents believe that segregation will do more for the welfare and health of other inmates, and staff who work closely with them. Concerns stem from those not being honest about his or her HIV status and using it to retaliate against fellow prisoners.

However, given the often hostile and aggressive nature of prisons, segregation would be an easy decision to make. However separating out those who are HIV-positive by making them wear wristbands is blatantly discriminatory. Not allowing this group to interact on the basis of HIV is not understandable. With millions of dollars invested in programs, educating those incarcerated about stigmas surrounding the disease would be a better use of time.

Do you think HIV-positive prisoners should be segregated? Thoughts?





  • http://www.facebook.com/tyteon Ty Teon

    I think that is ridiculous. It’s like HIV positive men are being quarentined.

    • Brent

      I agree with you! So are we one crime away from folks not in jail who are positive wearing armbands? How about tshirts? Bull.

  • Cold Fire

    I THINK THEY SHOULD. WE NEED TO STOP THE SPREAD AS MUCH AS WE CAN. TOO BAD. THE DAMN NUMBERS DO NOT LIE! I THINK ITS A BIG RISK WITH SEX BEING UNPROTECTED IN PRISONS AND RAPE HAPPENING TOO. NOT TO MENTION FIGHTS GET VERY BLOODY. ITS NOT LIKE THE HIV PRISONERS HAPPEN TO NOT BE ONES THAT HAVE NOT COMMITTED VIOLENT CRIMES AND SUCH. THEY ARE STILL COLD HEARTED RAPISTS, MURDERS, SERIAL KILLERS. WE DO NOT KNOW THEIR MENTAL STATE. WE CAN NOT ASSUME ITS JUST GOING TO GO WELL BC WE SO CALLED EDUCATE THEM.

  • J. Vryheid

    Nope, we should not accomodate to prisoners. If you know they have HIV, it’s simple, don’t have sex with them. However, if a prisoner is raped by someone with HIV, they should get charged with first degree murder.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=9312350 Darryl TheGriot

    i don’t think the issue of quarantine is a problem. through public health statutes, the federal , state, and local governments can quarantine law-abiding citizens against their will, if they declare a public health emergency.

    i think the more critical issue is why prisoners with HIV/AIDS are being housed on death row, in maximum security prisons/cell blocks, and in solitary confinement when their crimes don’t call for that treatment. i seems like the severity of their sentence is being enhanced simply because they have HIV/AIDS. that, to me, ain’t right. and it don’t match up with the idea of prohibiting cruel and unusual punishment.

    if we arrest these people we have a responsibility to care for them while they’re imprisoned. if the system can’t meet the dual demands of imprisonment and public health…then maybe we should be public health prisons..or prisonize hospital wards…or, something else.

    it also seems like the system is admitting it’s own failures in treating and containing the epidemic, in it’s ability prevent prison rape, and in it’s ability to monitor and control it’s on prisoners. and instead of dealing with those issues, it treats people with HIV/AIDS suspiciously, simply because they have the disease. no bueno.

  • blowfish

    I’ve met a fair share of people at the clinic who “claim” they contracted HIV, syphilis, G/C, or HPV in jail. Now that’s their business if they want to mess around with that segment of the population who are already at risk for STIs. However, I understand that some men in jail do not have a choice. There lies the problem. What do you do about that. I’m pretty sure those men who are burned do not give a flying *#&$ who they infect while being in jail.

Social


SUBSCRIBE TO OUR EMAIL LIST





recent stories